Bradley Schlozman
- March 10, 2024
- Attorney
Quick Facts
Date Of Birth | Feb 6, 1971(1971-02-06) |
Age | 53 |
Country | United States |
Horoscope | Aquarius |
Bradley Schlozman Biography
Birthday | Feb 6 |
Birth Year | 1971 |
Place Of Birth | Kansas |
Bradley Schlozman is one of the most popular and richest Attorney who was born on February 6, 1971 in Overland Park, Kansas, United States. As of June 1, 2023, Bradley Schlozman has a net worth approximately $5 Million. Just five days before the 2006 election, Schlozman announced the indictments of four of the former ACORN workers, who all ultimately pleaded guilty to the voter registration charges. The election featured an extremely close Senate race between the incumbent Jim Talent and eventual winner Claire McCaskill. Former U.S. Attorneys Todd Graves and David Iglesias, expressed surprise at the indictments, claiming that they appeared to violate longstanding Department of Justice policy to avoid overtly politically related prosecutions during an election. Joseph D. Rich, a 35-year veteran of the Department of Justice and chief of its voting section from 1999 to 2005, wrote a Los Angeles Times op-ed criticizing the prosecutions as politically motivated.
Bradley Joseph Schlozman (born February 6, 1971) is an American attorney who served as acting head of the Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Justice under Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. A member of the Republican Party, Schlozman was appointed by Gonzales as the interim U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, replacing Todd Graves, and he assumed that office on March 23, 2006. In April 2007, Schlozman left the U.S. Attorney position to work at the Executive Office for United States Attorneys.
In 2003, Tom DeLay spearheaded a major redistricting plan for the state of Texas. Justice Department lawyers wrote a memo opposing the plan, concluding that the it violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The memo was endorsed unanimously by lawyers and analysts from the Department’s Voting section. Nevertheless, Schlozman and several other political appointees overruled the lawyers’ objections and approved DeLay’s plan. In League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, the Supreme Court issued a complex 100-plus page concluding that all but one of the thirty-two district in the Texas redistricting plan satisfied the requirements of the Voting Rights Act.
In 2005, Georgia passed a controversial voter I.D. law which required that all voters to show photo identification at the polls, and eliminated previously accepted forms of voter identification, including social security cards, birth certificates or utility bills. As required by the Voting Rights Act, “Georgia and other states with a history of voter discrimination” (mostly southern states) are required to show that law changes will not have a discriminatory impact on minority voters, and to get approval by the Department of Justice under 1965 Voting Rights Act According to rumors reported in the press, all of the staff of the Civil Rights division of DOJ, save one, recommended against the new law’s approval, but Schlozman and other political appointees overruled the staff and approved it. The law was initially held unconstitutional as against the Georgia state constitution, but that ruling was reversed by a unanimous decision of the Georgia Supreme Court. In federal court, U.S. District Judge Harold L. Murphy issued an injunction against the law, holding that it was constitutionally suspect but declining to consider whether it offended the Voting Rights Act. Subsequent to the federal court decision, Schlozman wrote an op-ed in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution defending the Department of Justice’s decision to pre-clear the Voter ID law under the Voting Rights Act. Although the Justice Department’s actions were heavily criticized by liberal groups, no court has ever held that the Georgia ID law runs afoul of the Voting Rights Act, the only statutory provision considered by the DOJ in issuing its approval of the law. In fact, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld the law against all constitutional challenges.
Bradley Schlozman Net Worth
Net Worth | $5 Million |
Source Of Income | Attorney |
House | Living in own house. |
Bradley Schlozman is one of the richest Attorney from United States. According to our analysis, Wikipedia, Forbes & Business Insider, Bradley Schlozman 's net worth $5 Million.
Height, Weight & Body Measurements
Bradley Schlozman height Not available right now. weight Not Known & body measurements will update soon.
Bradley Schlozman
According to our records, Bradley Schlozman is possibily single & has not been previously engaged. As of January 12, 2023, Bradley Schlozman’s is not dating anyone.
Relationships Record : We have no records of past relationships for Bradley Schlozman. You may help us to build the dating records for Bradley Schlozman!
Facts & Trivia
Ranked on the list of most popular Attorney. Also ranked in the elit list of famous people born in United States. Bradley Schlozman celebrates birthday on February 6 of every year.