Michael A. Ramos

Quick Facts

Full Name	Michael A. Ramos
Occupation	Lawyer
Date Of Birth	Aug 5, 1957(1957-08-05)
Age	67
Birthplace	Redlands
Country	United States
Birth City	California
Horoscope	Leo

Michael A. Ramos Biography

Michael A. Ramos is one of the most popular and richest Lawyer who was born on August 5, 1957 in Redlands, California, United States. American attorney who was elected 35th District Attorney for San Bernardino County in February 2002.

He is a Republican party member who is Hispanic like He is a hispanic member of the Republican party like Marco Rubio..

Michael Anthony “Mike” Ramos (born August 5, 1957) is an American attorney. He was the 35th district attorney of San Bernardino County, California. He was first elected in 2002 and is the first Hispanic district attorney elected in San Bernardino County. He was defeated June 2018 by Jason Anderson, a former prosecutor and Ontario, California council member.

Ramos was elected in 2002 and reelected in 2006, 2010 and 2014. He served as president of the California District Attorneys Association and as chair of the Corrections and Reentry Committee for the National District Attorneys Association.

He is the older brother of a sibling, and was born in Redlands (California).

Michael A. Ramos Net Worth

Michael A. Ramos is one of the richest Lawyer from United States. According to our analysis, Wikipedia, Forbes & Business Insider, Michael A. Ramos 's net worth $5 Million. (Last Update: December 11, 2023)

Before becoming a Probation Officer, he received a Bachelor’s degree in Sociology from University of California Riverside in 1980.

In 2002, he was the first Hispanic District Attorney in San Bernardino County.

The eldest of three children, Ramos was born at Redlands Community Hospital in Redlands, California, in 1957. Ramos attended Redlands High School. After graduating in 1976, Ramos earned his bachelor’s degree in sociology from the University of California, Riverside, in 1980 and a Doctorate of Jurisprudence from Citrus Belt Law School in Riverside in 1988. Notably, this law school was unaccredited in the state of California, and has since closed its doors. He was admitted to the California bar in 1989. Ramos’ government service began in 1980, when he started as a group counselor with the Probation Department and then later became a probation officer. He started his career with the District Attorney’s Office in June 1989, as a deputy district attorney in the Major Crimes Unit.

Height, Weight & Body Measurements

Michael A. Ramos height 5 ft 3 in Michael weight Not Known & body measurements will update soon.

Who is Michael A. Ramos Dating?

According to our records, Michael A. Ramos is possibily single & has not been previously engaged. As of December 1, 2023, Michael A. Ramos’s is not dating anyone.

Relationships Record : We have no records of past relationships for Michael A. Ramos. You may help us to build the dating records for Michael A. Ramos!

Ramos is in favor of capital punishment. In November 2012, Ramos campaigned heavily against Proposition 34, also known as the SAFE California Act. Proposition 34 sought to replace California’s death penalty with a life sentence with no chance of parole as the maximum punishment for murder. The initiative to repeal the death penalty failed by a narrow margin of 52.8% to 47.2%. In 2016, Ramos co-chaired the Death Penalty Reform Initiative Committee for Proposition 66 which sought to keep the death penalty in California. On Nov. 9, 2016, the initiative passed with 51.13% of the vote.

Facts & Trivia

Michael Ranked on the list of most popular Lawyer. Also ranked in the elit list of famous people born in United States. Michael A. Ramos celebrates birthday on August 5 of every year.

A jury acquitted three of the defendants, Jeff Burum, Paul Biane and Mark Kirk, and charges against the fourth defendant, Jim Erwin, were dropped after a separate jury deadlocked. Several jurors said they believed key prosecution witnesses had lied and questioned why the case was ever brought in the first place. By early 2018, all of the defendants had filed separate claims against the county and the state of California, citing malicious prosecution and seeking in total more than $100 million for damages.