Prashant Bhushan

January 10, 2024
Lawyer

Quick Facts

Prashant Bhushan
Full Name Prashant Bhushan
Occupation Lawyer
Date Of Birth Oct 15, 1956(1956-10-15)
Age 68
Birthplace Delhi
Country India
Horoscope Libra

Prashant Bhushan Biography

Name Prashant Bhushan
Birthday Oct 15
Birth Year 1956
Place Of Birth Delhi
Birth Country India
Birth Sign Libra
Parents Shanti Bhushan, Kumud Bhushan
Spouse Deepa Bhushan

Prashant Bhushan is one of the most popular and richest Lawyer who was born on October 15, 1956 in Delhi, India.

In 1990, he successfully got the criminal liability aspect in the Bhopal gas tragedy reopened by SC, by challenging the settlement in the case of compensation to the victims. This reopened the case against the former Chairman of Union Carbide Corporation Warren Anderson (now deceased).

In 1990, Bhushan wrote a book Bofors, the selling of a nation (1990) on the Bofors scandal.

Prashant Bhushan Net Worth

Net Worth $5 Million
Source Of Income Lawyer
House Living in own house.

Prashant Bhushan is one of the richest Lawyer from India. According to our analysis, Wikipedia, Forbes & Business Insider, Prashant Bhushan 's net worth $5 Million. (Last Update: December 11, 2023)

Prashant Bhushan is the oldest of the four children of Shanti Bhushan and Kumud Bhushan. His father is a lawyer-activist and a former Union Law Minister in the Morarji Desai government. Bhushan, who briefly attended IIT Madras and Princeton University has a degree in law from Allahabad University. While still a student, Bhushan wrote The Case that Shook India, a book on the case that set aside Indira Gandhi’s election in 1974.

Height, Weight & Body Measurements

Prashant Bhushan height Not available right now. Raman weight Not Known & body measurements will update soon.

Who is Prashant Bhushan Dating?

According to our records, Prashant Bhushan married to Deepa Bhushan. As of December 1, 2023, Prashant Bhushan’s is not dating anyone.

Relationships Record : We have no records of past relationships for Prashant Bhushan. You may help us to build the dating records for Prashant Bhushan!

In February 2006, as counsel for Lok Sevak Sangh, Bhushan submitted to the Supreme Court that the MP Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS) might not be constitutionally valid. A TV channel had recently aired video of a sting in which it appeared that some MPs had taken bribes under the scheme. Bhushan said none of the normal controls were being applied, and the scheme was breeding corruption. The same year, Bhushan also represented the CPIL in a petition alleging that PepsiCo and Coca-Cola were failing to warn the public of harmful ingredients in their beverages, and were luring young children through misleading advertising.

Facts & Trivia

Raman Ranked on the list of most popular Lawyer. Also ranked in the elit list of famous people born in India. Prashant Bhushan celebrates birthday on October 15 of every year.

Prashant Bhushan acted for the CPIL when it took the lead in filing a suit against the Government of India for irregularities in a major award of spectrum for 2G mobile telephones. The CPIL petition alleged that the government had lost $15.53 billion by issuing spectrum in 2008 based on 2001 prices, and by not following a competitive bidding process. The Supreme Court asked the CBI to probe the irregularities in the auction of 2G spectrum. The inquiry resulted in the resignation of the telecom minister A. Raja, who was later arrested along with others including the DMK MP Kanimozhi, officials of Unitech wireless and officials of Reliance ADAG. In September 2011 Bhushan presented evidence that appeared to disprove the claim by the CBI that Dayanidhi Maran, the former telecom minister, had not applied undue pressure to the owner of Aircel to sell to the Maxis group of Malaysia. Bhushan said the CBI’s investigation had been “less than honest”. In January 2012 Bhushan questioned why the CBI had failed to lay charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act against companies such as Essar Group and Loop Mobile despite strong evidence against them. In February 2012 the Supreme Court declared the allocation of spectrum had been illegal.

More Lawyers

Related Posts